It is currently September 22nd, 2018, 7:01 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Should we invalidate Pseudacris sierra?
PostPosted: August 17th, 2018, 2:41 pm 
User avatar

Joined: June 7th, 2010, 5:19 am
Posts: 1985
Location: Redding, CA
And by "we" I mean people who, like, have degrees and get published, not me.

Hyla regilla was described by Baird and Girard in 1852,

In the very same journal, Hallowell described Hyla scapularis - and the description, it seems pretty clear it is P. regilla complex to me, and I believe it is considered a junior synonym to Hyla regilla described just a few pages before it in the same issue of the same journal.

The description simply says Oregon territory.

If the locality though was within current P. sierra range, since P. sierra was not described until 1966, wouldn't that actually make P. sierra a junior synonym to Pseudacris [=Hyla] scapularis?

Does anyone know the specimen number and more precision with respect to where it was collected?

From the description, it was collected by a Dr. Shumard for the Academy, which I presume would be the same Academy that has the type specimen for Oregon Red-spotted gartersnake since it was described a page earlier and also specifies collected by a Dr. Shumard.


Top
 Profile WWW 
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Should we invalidate Pseudacris sierra?
PostPosted: August 19th, 2018, 5:35 pm 
User avatar

Joined: June 7th, 2010, 10:07 am
Posts: 206
Location: Earth
Hyla regilla sierra Jameson et al., 1966 - type locality ‘‘1 1/4 miles SSE of Tioga Pass Ranger Station (east of entrance to Yosemite National Park)."

No need to invalidate the species if it doesn't exist; Comments in the 2017 SSAR names list indicate P. sierra will untimately be included in the synonymy of P. regilla (again.)


Top
 Profile WWW 
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Should we invalidate Pseudacris sierra?
PostPosted: August 19th, 2018, 6:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: June 7th, 2010, 10:41 am
Posts: 4730
Location: "Buy My Books"-land
Hmmm, is the Baja Treefrog going to go the same way? That would make entries in the database much simpler...but I would lose 2 species because of it. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Should we invalidate Pseudacris sierra?
PostPosted: August 19th, 2018, 10:04 pm 
User avatar

Joined: June 7th, 2010, 10:07 am
Posts: 206
Location: Earth
If it happens, the 3 species will probably become 1 again.

Brian Hubbs wrote:
Hmmm, is the Baja Treefrog going to go the same way? That would make entries in the database much simpler...but I would lose 2 species because of it. :lol:


Top
 Profile WWW 
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Should we invalidate Pseudacris sierra?
PostPosted: August 30th, 2018, 6:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: June 7th, 2010, 7:39 am
Posts: 3534
This all sounds really mean, everyone deserves to be validated.


Top
 Profile WWW 
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Should we invalidate Pseudacris sierra?
PostPosted: September 8th, 2018, 5:54 am 
User avatar

Joined: June 7th, 2010, 5:19 am
Posts: 1985
Location: Redding, CA
So I guess Hubbs changing to Trila Regilla books is out...


Top
 Profile WWW 
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Should we invalidate Pseudacris sierra?
PostPosted: September 11th, 2018, 7:53 am 
User avatar

Joined: June 7th, 2010, 3:40 pm
Posts: 563
Location: Manteca, CA
Yes. LOL


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: